Archive for the 'Amusing' Category

Can you help poor Ségolène beat Sarkozy

Thursday, April 26th, 2007

Given Sarkozy’s predeliction for thinking of the presidential election as a football match, this website sent by a friend is fun and useful. See if you can help Ségolène beat Sarkozy - it’s a great game!

How to decide which way to vote

Friday, April 20th, 2007

The last day of the campaign – as from midnight tonight we must all fall silent and let the voters ruminate. Still undecided who to vote for? Or who you would vote for were you French? Try one of the on-line tests to see which candidate most closely fits your vision of the world. Even if you’re not eligible to vote it’s fun and quite instructive. I spent a happy hour trying five sites, each offering multiple-choice questionnaires. Two of them were created by students of Sciences Po and most have tested the questions on all 12 candidates to see whether they conform to the questionnaire’s image of them. The five I tried are Politest; Sitoyen; Quel candidat; Pourquivoter; and Polimetre.

Your level of French has to be reasonable, particularly for Politest which was created by former students of Sciences Po and is perhaps the most serious. In most, however, the questions can be worked out with a modicum of vocabulary, and it’s always interesting to have a non-French take on these French issues – for example employment charges. I have the feeling that if you say the 35 hour week should be repealed you are automatically classified somewhere to the right of Genghis Khan, which you then have to rectify by saying you believe the frontiers should be closed to illegal immigrants, especially those coming en masse from Mongolia.

A disadvantage is that most questionnaires insist you give an answer to every question: not all give a Don’t Know option. It’s also quite hard to choose between 1) taxes should be lowered when the State can afford it, 2) taxes should be lowered so businesses can invest and 3) taxes which weigh heavily on the poor should be lowered: all three seem to me justifiable. Or again, 1) rather than assisting people, they should be taught responsibility, 2) the worst off should be helped by the state but people should not expect everything from it and 3) the state’s duty is to help everyone live decently. You can tell that those two examples come from the Sciences Po questionnaire. Another test asks you to make a straight choice of the most important issue in the campaign – they then ask you to choose between (French) unemployment and global warming. That is always the weakness of multiple choice questionnaires.

Having taken note of your political views, several then either ask directly which candidate attracts you most (I suspect many otherwise undecided French women will vote for Ségolène Royal through gender solidarity), or they offer a series of wider questions to see what sort of person you are, for example “Do you think Zidane was justified in head-butting Materazzi?” which is a simple test of nationality. There is no Have Never Heard of Either option.

Finally the results may surprise or even shock. One (the Sciences Po one) had me voting for Generation Ecologique – not an option since the candidate didn’t get 500 signatures. Two had me voting Sarkozy and one Royal (neither of whom would I vote for if I had the vote). The fifth and most accurate had me voting……ah, but that would spoil it. Have a go yourself.

Frogs, not sardines……

Friday, February 2nd, 2007

On Wednesday, Nicolas Sarkozy was in London, drumming up support amongst the French ex-pats. I knew a couple of friends were going, so I asked them to send in their impressions. I was surprised nothing came in yesterday, the day after the event, then this morning this came from Tom Freke, a financial journalist:

Sorry for the delay … the reason for it is that I couldn’t get into the event on Tuesday and have been waiting to hear if a friend of mine did and I could get something from them. I have just found out they didn’t either, but thought they knew someone who had……

There was a huge mass of people outside at 6.30, when it was meant to start, but the people that were allowed in had already been let in. The crowd was left there, people thought, either for the TV cameras or because they didn’t understand the form of English shouted by the police …
“We are frogs not sardines” shouted one indignant woman, on being squeezed in.

Looking at the mess of people standing outside the venue, someone said “You can tell the people aren’t English, where’s the queue?”

Here is another comment from someone I do not know, but who was clearly trying to get a peek at the great man….

I was in that scrum too. I got within 20 people of getting in but they shut the doors and then said not one word. The local UMP deliberately over-invited in my view (a) to avoid the embarrassment of a half-empty room and (b) assuming that didn’t happen, to show crowds of young people gagging to see the great man. On the other hand, it was a good speech as you can see on the video/international page at www.sarkozy.fr.